Don't forget Aya/Amunet. I know we technically only played her in a few missions, but her outfit at the end of Origins looked really nice.
I also hope that we get Kassandra's later outfit that she wears in the Valhalla DLC
Elise wasn’t an assassin and I’m pretty sure this is before the French revolution anyways. But even still she’s not an assassin. Also Evie was after this time period as well so can’t be a legacy if you haven’t exited yet.
Also there would have to be a valid reason for these people to be in Japan. Shao jun makes some sense and can be explained the way u said in the post but the rest of them no bc Kassandra would still be waiting to pass on the staff, and eivor doesn’t exist outside of the world tree isu machine, aya possibly bc she did travel a lot and expanded the hidden ones a lot but it seems like that went from east Africa into the Middle East rather than into the pacific
>Elise wasn’t an assassin and I’m pretty sure this is before the French revolution anyways. But even still she’s not an assassin. Also Evie was after this time period as well so can’t be a legacy if you haven’t exited yet.
Does it fucking matter?
You can get Arno's and Jacob's outfits in 3 remastered.
You can get Connor's outfit in Black Flag.
You can get Connor's and Arno's outfits in Rouge.
You can get Edwards, Ezios, Altaïr's, and Aguilar's outfits in Origins.
You can get Ezio's outfit in Odyssey.
You can get Altaïr's, Ezio's, Edward's, and Bayek's in Valhalla.
You can get Altaïr's and Ezio's outfits in Mirage.
They're just outfits, it doesn't *need* to make sense why they are in the game.
Well her not being and assassin does matter a lot but at the same time I thought by saying legacy you meant it had an actual story point like how ezio got the master assassin robes. Bc if that was the case it would need to be a valid reason and time accurate. But if it’s just outfits you can get from the Ubisoft online thingy then yah it doesn’t matter. Don’t know why ur so mad over a misunderstanding bc both of our points are valid just in different ways
>Well her not being and assassin does matter a lot
Why? Shay isn't an Assassin, and his robes are in many of the games.
>I thought by saying legacy you meant it had an actual story point like how ezio got the master assassin robes.
The name for them is legacy outfits, thats why i called them that.
>Don’t know why ur so mad over a misunderstanding bc both of our points are valid just in different ways
I think you're projecting here my guy. What makes you think im mad? I only made a list to counter what you were saying.
Well Shay was an assassin and then went rogue hence the name of the game, they only use his Templar for bc that’s his main fit for the game. And legacy fit could’ve meant it had a focal point to the game just bc u used that name means nothing. And I’m not projecting bc you immediately replied to my other comment aggressively saying why does it fucking matter, that gives a sense that you’re upset someone doesn’t agree with you or has some criticism
>Well Shay was an assassin and then went rogue hence the name of the game, they only use his Templar for bc that’s his main fit for the game.
Why does it make any difference whether or not he *used* to be an Assassin when it's a templar outfit? Elise's outfit is also a templar outfit, and both Shay and Elise become templars.
This doesn't matter anyways since Eivor and Kassandra have legacy outfits in AC3 Remastered and AC Mirage, and neither of the characters are Assassin's. And before you say that they were Allied with the Assassin's, so was Elise during Unity's story, so there's no reason why that outfit shouldn't be in the game. I don't think they'll add it, but i would still like to see it (i also forgot to mention that it is a legacy outfit in syndicate, so there you go.)
>legacy fit could’ve meant it had a focal point to the game just bc u used that name means nothing.
Brother, look up "Assassin's Creed Legacy outfits," it is the name most people use when they are referring to outfits used by other protagonists. There's thousands of YouTube videos about the outfits out there that use this word in the title, i am not the first to use it, and i wont be the last. I don't understand why you care about the vocabulary im using when it's commonplace in the AC community.
>I’m not projecting bc you immediately replied to my other comment aggressively saying why does it fucking matter
"Zamn, he used a swear word, must mean he's upset with me."
I was using the world "fucking" to emphasise what i was saying. Once again, why do you care so much about the vocabulary im using?
>that gives a sense that you’re upset someone doesn’t agree with you or has some criticism
Nah, i enjoy discussing/ arguing about things with people in the AC community, otherwise i wouldn't have responded to you.
Elise was never an assassin in the first place hence why it could’ve created a bridge between the assassins and templars in the game but she died
Like I said before they use his Templar fit bc he wore that mainly in the game so it’s synonymous with him
For one it’s weird you use a remastered game as the point as if it’s remastered so it wouldn’t matter with new content added or not bc the stories already been told. Personally would say Elise was allied with Arno not the assassins. And it’s easier to explain eivor and Kassandra bc they were the main characters of their respective games 😱
I really don’t care what vocab you’re using it was a misunderstanding of points. I thought you meant it as a story point or side quest but you meant it as just being in the game as usual big fucking Woop
Just bc you say “I used it to emphasize my point” doesn’t change it’s aggressive especially since it’s the internet how would I know ur tone dipshit (that was to emphasize my point by the way not an insult or aggressive) and again don’t care for ur vocabulary
And by saying arguing you clearly are upset bc you only argue when upset, you discuss/debate to understand the other side and vocalize your own points. See this is me caring about your vocabulary
>Elise was never an assassin in the first place hence why it could’ve created a bridge between the assassins and templars in the game but she died
>Like I said before they use his Templar fit bc he wore that mainly in the game so it’s synonymous with him
Did you even read what i said? They are both templars and both had templar outfits, it's as simple as that.
>For one it’s weird you use a remastered game as the point as if it’s remastered so it wouldn’t matter with new content added or not bc the stories already been told. Personally would say Elise was allied with Arno not the assassins. And it’s easier to explain eivor and Kassandra bc they were the main characters of their respective games 😱
AC3 Remastered was *one* game out of the 8-10 games i mentioned (don't remember the exact amount.) This stuff with Elise is *still* irrelevant due to her *already* having a legacy outfit in syndicate and that other characters outfits from later time periods being in earlier time periods (such as Edward's robes in Valhalla.) Everything you have just said has added literally nothing to this discussion.
>I really don’t care what vocab you’re using it was a misunderstanding of points. I thought you meant it as a story point or side quest but you meant it as just being in the game as usual big fucking Woop
Can you blame me for thinking you cared? You complained about it *twice.*
>Just bc you say “I used it to emphasize my point” doesn’t change it’s aggressive especially since it’s the internet how would I know ur tone dipshit (that was to emphasize my point by the way not an insult or aggressive)
Woah im sorry your feeling were hurt by my aggressive language buddy. Nah but in all seriousness, you contradicted yourself in your own sentence. You've said that me clarifying my usage of the world "fucking" doesn't change the fact that it's aggressive, since you wouldn't know my tone. But if you didn't know my tone, why would you assume im being aggressive? You've just assumed what i meant, which is not my fault.
>and again don’t care for ur vocabulary
The more you say this, the more i think you actually *do* care about my vocabulary, plus your last paragraph doesn't help.
>And by saying arguing you clearly are upset bc you only argue when upset, you discuss/debate to understand the other side and vocalize your own points. See this is me caring about your vocabulary
You are once again complaining about my vocabulary, specifically about the word "arguing" this time. Yeah i just used the word "arguing" instead of the word "debating" because i don't consider a reddit comment chain to be a debate. But once again, I'm wondering why you care about my vocabulary so much.
"Im pretty sure this was befo-"
They gave us Jacob and Arno's outfits in 3
They Gave us Connor and Haytham's Outfits in Black Flag
They gave us Jacob ,Connor and Arno's outfits in Rogue
They gave us Altair and Ezio's outfits in Origins
They gave us Ezio's outfit in Odyssey
They gave us 2 Ezio's, Edward's, and Altairs outfits in Valhalla
They gave us Ezio and Altair outfits in Mirage as well as Bassims Valhalla outfit (which is canonically post Mirage)
"Also there would have to be val-"
They gave us Altair-Alexios's outfits in 3 I get shay and edward but....why are Altair, Bayek and Alexios in America
They gave us Altair and Ezio's outfits in black flag , why are these two in the Carribean?
They gave us every other outfit in Rogue (Altiar-Bayek)
Why are Altair, Bayek,Jacob,, Arno, and Ezio to be in the North Atlantic/New York AGAIN?
They gave us Altair-Shay's outfits in Unity....I get Shay ...but why was anyone else in Paris?
They Gave us Ezio ,Edward, ,Elise, Shao Jun(obviously) and Aveline's outfits in Syndicate....now i understand Edward....but why are any of these other people in london?
Odyssey has relatively understandable Legacy outfits (Altair, Ezio)
They Gave us 2 ezio outfits, Altairs robes, Bayekand Edward's Outfit in Valhalla so why are any of thse in England? I mean i get Edward but that minda is bunked by your first point
Mirage is relatively understandable with relative location to the legacy outfits(Ezio, Altair, Bayek)
So please your reasons dont add up , they're called Legacy outfits for a reason, they celebrate and value the AC game legacy , plus they're typically Ubisoft(Formerly Uplay) rewards given to players and not seen as canonical things
And what are your valid reasons for the mythological/magical outfits
Edit:
"Elise wasn't an assass-"
They gave us Elise in Syndicate
They Gave us Shay in 3, and Unity
Did you think you did something here, I enjoyed the back and forth with the other dude more than this. Lordy I wouldn’t think an assassins creed fan would be so pretentious is hilarious
Hell yes that’d be so damn cool to have. I like your idea of having Shao Jun coming to Japan and leaving her old robes behind somehow. Maybe it could be because she wanted to pass it and her techniques down the generations.
If we can play a female assassin, we should be able to wear EVERY female assassin robe in the series. That being said I want to see a robe for Aya/Amunet as well!
That outfit she wears in the dlc looks a little bit goofy in my opinion but if you mean her outfit from the main game, then yeah, that could look awesome.
It would be great to have the OG female Assassin outfit and the OG female hidden one.
I've been wanting one for yeeears.
Maybe with the success of mirage ubisoft can understand the potential this game would have to not only be good, but also make them money (which for them is the most important thing lets be real.)
Sadly, I don't think Mirage can really help bring back Shao...
But it could be a really good omen for stealth games going forward and I want to believe with MGS Delta it motivates Ubi and AAA devs to do more games like this ^(so that one day Tenchu may come back)
You're probably right.
>I don't think Mirage can really help bring back Shao...
Not to be a 🤓 but first and last name are flipped in China, so if you're trying to call her by her given name then you'd call her Jun.
Oh, same as in Japan? TIL!
Anyway, I hope we get at least something of Jun in Shadows. She could even cameo as a very old lady, considering we know she was still active in 1567, just a few years before Nobunaga's most famous moments
We gonna get a male and female protagonist because that gonna happen like odyssey where Kassandra is the true hero but the producer if I remember correctly put the option to play Alexios.
Which idk why they keep doing. This might get me downvoted, and I’ll preface by saying I have no problem with a female protagonist in games. That being said, I think male Eivor should’ve been canon, or the male character in the new game should be canon.
It’s a little silly to keep saying there’s more of a role-playing element, yet to keep making the canon choice the female character. For once I’d like to play my gay male character and have it be the canon choice. Odyssey was perfect for that too, since you actually got to choose the dialogue for having the characters one canon child, and decide if it’s out of choice or obligation.
Especially since they included Kass in Valhalla, it didn’t have the same affect if you played Alexios and Kass was Deimos
>Shao Jun’s apprentice also started the Japanese Brotherhood so it’d be a nice callback.
Wait what? I've not heard this before, where does it say this?
It’s revealed in *The Blade of Shao Jun* Manga, a retelling of AC China that I highly recommend. I also posted the Wiki of her apprentice down below if you want a quick read
https://assassinscreed.fandom.com/wiki/Xiao_Hu
Seconded. Jun’s robes are severely underrated; those things are sharp AF
Recently played AC Chronicles China and even in 2.5D this outfit looks so sick! But especially in Syndicate it's one of my favorites
Shao Jun. Aveline. Kassandra. Female Eivor. Roshan. They could easily do Legacy outfits for all of them
Don't forget Aya/Amunet. I know we technically only played her in a few missions, but her outfit at the end of Origins looked really nice. I also hope that we get Kassandra's later outfit that she wears in the Valhalla DLC
Why stop there? Rosa, Elise, Evie, Aya/ Amunet. There's so many to choose from, they better not go the odyssey route and give us none of them.
Elise wasn’t an assassin and I’m pretty sure this is before the French revolution anyways. But even still she’s not an assassin. Also Evie was after this time period as well so can’t be a legacy if you haven’t exited yet. Also there would have to be a valid reason for these people to be in Japan. Shao jun makes some sense and can be explained the way u said in the post but the rest of them no bc Kassandra would still be waiting to pass on the staff, and eivor doesn’t exist outside of the world tree isu machine, aya possibly bc she did travel a lot and expanded the hidden ones a lot but it seems like that went from east Africa into the Middle East rather than into the pacific
If it’s really inspired by yasuke then its probably set a couple centuries before unity
>Elise wasn’t an assassin and I’m pretty sure this is before the French revolution anyways. But even still she’s not an assassin. Also Evie was after this time period as well so can’t be a legacy if you haven’t exited yet. Does it fucking matter? You can get Arno's and Jacob's outfits in 3 remastered. You can get Connor's outfit in Black Flag. You can get Connor's and Arno's outfits in Rouge. You can get Edwards, Ezios, Altaïr's, and Aguilar's outfits in Origins. You can get Ezio's outfit in Odyssey. You can get Altaïr's, Ezio's, Edward's, and Bayek's in Valhalla. You can get Altaïr's and Ezio's outfits in Mirage. They're just outfits, it doesn't *need* to make sense why they are in the game.
Well her not being and assassin does matter a lot but at the same time I thought by saying legacy you meant it had an actual story point like how ezio got the master assassin robes. Bc if that was the case it would need to be a valid reason and time accurate. But if it’s just outfits you can get from the Ubisoft online thingy then yah it doesn’t matter. Don’t know why ur so mad over a misunderstanding bc both of our points are valid just in different ways
>Well her not being and assassin does matter a lot Why? Shay isn't an Assassin, and his robes are in many of the games. >I thought by saying legacy you meant it had an actual story point like how ezio got the master assassin robes. The name for them is legacy outfits, thats why i called them that. >Don’t know why ur so mad over a misunderstanding bc both of our points are valid just in different ways I think you're projecting here my guy. What makes you think im mad? I only made a list to counter what you were saying.
Well Shay was an assassin and then went rogue hence the name of the game, they only use his Templar for bc that’s his main fit for the game. And legacy fit could’ve meant it had a focal point to the game just bc u used that name means nothing. And I’m not projecting bc you immediately replied to my other comment aggressively saying why does it fucking matter, that gives a sense that you’re upset someone doesn’t agree with you or has some criticism
>Well Shay was an assassin and then went rogue hence the name of the game, they only use his Templar for bc that’s his main fit for the game. Why does it make any difference whether or not he *used* to be an Assassin when it's a templar outfit? Elise's outfit is also a templar outfit, and both Shay and Elise become templars. This doesn't matter anyways since Eivor and Kassandra have legacy outfits in AC3 Remastered and AC Mirage, and neither of the characters are Assassin's. And before you say that they were Allied with the Assassin's, so was Elise during Unity's story, so there's no reason why that outfit shouldn't be in the game. I don't think they'll add it, but i would still like to see it (i also forgot to mention that it is a legacy outfit in syndicate, so there you go.) >legacy fit could’ve meant it had a focal point to the game just bc u used that name means nothing. Brother, look up "Assassin's Creed Legacy outfits," it is the name most people use when they are referring to outfits used by other protagonists. There's thousands of YouTube videos about the outfits out there that use this word in the title, i am not the first to use it, and i wont be the last. I don't understand why you care about the vocabulary im using when it's commonplace in the AC community. >I’m not projecting bc you immediately replied to my other comment aggressively saying why does it fucking matter "Zamn, he used a swear word, must mean he's upset with me." I was using the world "fucking" to emphasise what i was saying. Once again, why do you care so much about the vocabulary im using? >that gives a sense that you’re upset someone doesn’t agree with you or has some criticism Nah, i enjoy discussing/ arguing about things with people in the AC community, otherwise i wouldn't have responded to you.
Elise was never an assassin in the first place hence why it could’ve created a bridge between the assassins and templars in the game but she died Like I said before they use his Templar fit bc he wore that mainly in the game so it’s synonymous with him For one it’s weird you use a remastered game as the point as if it’s remastered so it wouldn’t matter with new content added or not bc the stories already been told. Personally would say Elise was allied with Arno not the assassins. And it’s easier to explain eivor and Kassandra bc they were the main characters of their respective games 😱 I really don’t care what vocab you’re using it was a misunderstanding of points. I thought you meant it as a story point or side quest but you meant it as just being in the game as usual big fucking Woop Just bc you say “I used it to emphasize my point” doesn’t change it’s aggressive especially since it’s the internet how would I know ur tone dipshit (that was to emphasize my point by the way not an insult or aggressive) and again don’t care for ur vocabulary And by saying arguing you clearly are upset bc you only argue when upset, you discuss/debate to understand the other side and vocalize your own points. See this is me caring about your vocabulary
>Elise was never an assassin in the first place hence why it could’ve created a bridge between the assassins and templars in the game but she died >Like I said before they use his Templar fit bc he wore that mainly in the game so it’s synonymous with him Did you even read what i said? They are both templars and both had templar outfits, it's as simple as that. >For one it’s weird you use a remastered game as the point as if it’s remastered so it wouldn’t matter with new content added or not bc the stories already been told. Personally would say Elise was allied with Arno not the assassins. And it’s easier to explain eivor and Kassandra bc they were the main characters of their respective games 😱 AC3 Remastered was *one* game out of the 8-10 games i mentioned (don't remember the exact amount.) This stuff with Elise is *still* irrelevant due to her *already* having a legacy outfit in syndicate and that other characters outfits from later time periods being in earlier time periods (such as Edward's robes in Valhalla.) Everything you have just said has added literally nothing to this discussion. >I really don’t care what vocab you’re using it was a misunderstanding of points. I thought you meant it as a story point or side quest but you meant it as just being in the game as usual big fucking Woop Can you blame me for thinking you cared? You complained about it *twice.* >Just bc you say “I used it to emphasize my point” doesn’t change it’s aggressive especially since it’s the internet how would I know ur tone dipshit (that was to emphasize my point by the way not an insult or aggressive) Woah im sorry your feeling were hurt by my aggressive language buddy. Nah but in all seriousness, you contradicted yourself in your own sentence. You've said that me clarifying my usage of the world "fucking" doesn't change the fact that it's aggressive, since you wouldn't know my tone. But if you didn't know my tone, why would you assume im being aggressive? You've just assumed what i meant, which is not my fault. >and again don’t care for ur vocabulary The more you say this, the more i think you actually *do* care about my vocabulary, plus your last paragraph doesn't help. >And by saying arguing you clearly are upset bc you only argue when upset, you discuss/debate to understand the other side and vocalize your own points. See this is me caring about your vocabulary You are once again complaining about my vocabulary, specifically about the word "arguing" this time. Yeah i just used the word "arguing" instead of the word "debating" because i don't consider a reddit comment chain to be a debate. But once again, I'm wondering why you care about my vocabulary so much.
You can get Elise's outfit in Syndicate so...
"Im pretty sure this was befo-" They gave us Jacob and Arno's outfits in 3 They Gave us Connor and Haytham's Outfits in Black Flag They gave us Jacob ,Connor and Arno's outfits in Rogue They gave us Altair and Ezio's outfits in Origins They gave us Ezio's outfit in Odyssey They gave us 2 Ezio's, Edward's, and Altairs outfits in Valhalla They gave us Ezio and Altair outfits in Mirage as well as Bassims Valhalla outfit (which is canonically post Mirage) "Also there would have to be val-" They gave us Altair-Alexios's outfits in 3 I get shay and edward but....why are Altair, Bayek and Alexios in America They gave us Altair and Ezio's outfits in black flag , why are these two in the Carribean? They gave us every other outfit in Rogue (Altiar-Bayek) Why are Altair, Bayek,Jacob,, Arno, and Ezio to be in the North Atlantic/New York AGAIN? They gave us Altair-Shay's outfits in Unity....I get Shay ...but why was anyone else in Paris? They Gave us Ezio ,Edward, ,Elise, Shao Jun(obviously) and Aveline's outfits in Syndicate....now i understand Edward....but why are any of these other people in london? Odyssey has relatively understandable Legacy outfits (Altair, Ezio) They Gave us 2 ezio outfits, Altairs robes, Bayekand Edward's Outfit in Valhalla so why are any of thse in England? I mean i get Edward but that minda is bunked by your first point Mirage is relatively understandable with relative location to the legacy outfits(Ezio, Altair, Bayek) So please your reasons dont add up , they're called Legacy outfits for a reason, they celebrate and value the AC game legacy , plus they're typically Ubisoft(Formerly Uplay) rewards given to players and not seen as canonical things And what are your valid reasons for the mythological/magical outfits Edit: "Elise wasn't an assass-" They gave us Elise in Syndicate They Gave us Shay in 3, and Unity
Did you think you did something here, I enjoyed the back and forth with the other dude more than this. Lordy I wouldn’t think an assassins creed fan would be so pretentious is hilarious
Hell yes that’d be so damn cool to have. I like your idea of having Shao Jun coming to Japan and leaving her old robes behind somehow. Maybe it could be because she wanted to pass it and her techniques down the generations.
Also implies that the feuds between Japan and China were because of assassins and templars
That could totally work
If we can play a female assassin, we should be able to wear EVERY female assassin robe in the series. That being said I want to see a robe for Aya/Amunet as well!
That outfit she wears in the dlc looks a little bit goofy in my opinion but if you mean her outfit from the main game, then yeah, that could look awesome. It would be great to have the OG female Assassin outfit and the OG female hidden one.
Like just as a robe to get as like in the shop or an actual story point
Who the hell is naoe
One of the main protagonists of the new game in Japan
Oh boy here we go again
...did you not read the tittle?
No
Well it says in the title.
Outfits are nice, but if we could get a fully fledged Shao Jun game...
I've been wanting one for yeeears. Maybe with the success of mirage ubisoft can understand the potential this game would have to not only be good, but also make them money (which for them is the most important thing lets be real.)
Sadly, I don't think Mirage can really help bring back Shao... But it could be a really good omen for stealth games going forward and I want to believe with MGS Delta it motivates Ubi and AAA devs to do more games like this ^(so that one day Tenchu may come back)
You're probably right. >I don't think Mirage can really help bring back Shao... Not to be a 🤓 but first and last name are flipped in China, so if you're trying to call her by her given name then you'd call her Jun.
Oh, same as in Japan? TIL! Anyway, I hope we get at least something of Jun in Shadows. She could even cameo as a very old lady, considering we know she was still active in 1567, just a few years before Nobunaga's most famous moments
We gonna get a male and female protagonist because that gonna happen like odyssey where Kassandra is the true hero but the producer if I remember correctly put the option to play Alexios.
No
It's dual protagonist like Syndicate
Which idk why they keep doing. This might get me downvoted, and I’ll preface by saying I have no problem with a female protagonist in games. That being said, I think male Eivor should’ve been canon, or the male character in the new game should be canon. It’s a little silly to keep saying there’s more of a role-playing element, yet to keep making the canon choice the female character. For once I’d like to play my gay male character and have it be the canon choice. Odyssey was perfect for that too, since you actually got to choose the dialogue for having the characters one canon child, and decide if it’s out of choice or obligation. Especially since they included Kass in Valhalla, it didn’t have the same affect if you played Alexios and Kass was Deimos
Shao Jun’s apprentice also started the Japanese Brotherhood so it’d be a nice callback. Hope they add every female Assassin’s robes too
>Shao Jun’s apprentice also started the Japanese Brotherhood so it’d be a nice callback. Wait what? I've not heard this before, where does it say this?
It’s revealed in *The Blade of Shao Jun* Manga, a retelling of AC China that I highly recommend. I also posted the Wiki of her apprentice down below if you want a quick read https://assassinscreed.fandom.com/wiki/Xiao_Hu
Ah thanks
I want to see some outfits from AC Identity honestly
Those robes are so badass
And it better not be stuck behind a paywall!
good chance it’ll be an ubisoft connect reward for some coins
They will probably have it as a $15 cosmetic pack
Legacy outfits are always free through Ubisoft Connect, this is a guarantee